Publication Ethics
The publication process at Journal of RESP is the basis of the improvement and dissemination of information objectively and respectfully. Therefore, the procedures in this process improve the quality of the studies. Peer-reviewed studies are the ones that support and materialize the scientific method. At this point, it is of utmost importance that all parties included in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors) comply with the standards of ethical considerations. RESP expects all parties to hold the following ethical responsibilities. iThenticate, Turnitin or intihal.net can be used for professional plagiarism detection and prevention.
In terms of ethical rules; the situations requiring Ethics Committee Permission for the researches to be evaluated in the journal are as follows:
- Any research carried out with qualitative or quantitative approaches that require data collection from participants using survey, interview, focus group work, observation, experiment, interview techniques,
- Use of humans and animals (including material/data) for experimental or other scientific purposes,
- Clinical researches on humans,
- Researches on animals,
- Retrospective studies in accordance with the law of protection of personal data.
In this context, in the studies to be evaluated in our journal;
- In the case reports, it is stated that the “informed consent form” was taken,
- Obtaining and expressing permission from the owners for the use of scales, surveys, and photographs belonging to others,
- It should be noted that the copyright regulations are complied with for the ideas and works of art used.
Compliance with the research and publication ethics of the articles should be considered and The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) ' recommendations and the international standards of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) must be observed.
